Adil Baguirov Wedding
35) Mr. Baguirov can make One more assert stuffed with mistakes:As in the pretend stories about purely “nomadic†and or else “tribal†Turkic people today, that's not totally correct, considering the fact that first we'd like to determine which location we discuss and at what time. Next, how could, as an example, Sultan Mahmud Ghaznevi be of “tribal qualifications†– or a number of other Turkic rulers – who had been patrons of your arts and in case of the exact same Sultan Mahmud spoke fluently Turki, Arabic and Persian?
Certainly I know Azerbaijani Students have created quite false statements on proclaiming these teams as Turks and seek advice from some resources 80 yrs outdated such as Japhetic concept of Marr (who also viewed as Kurdish as Japhetic way too). But current discoveries are fairly distinct.
thirteen) As per Nizami getting an ethnic Arab, yet again we don't know just what exactly his father was, but substantial degree of Arabs did settle in the region Because the Arabic invasion. In truth Mr. Baguirov once again displays his ignorance by wondering this theory is ridiculous.
Any scholar boasting that Nizami’s father was Persian is just not a scholar – there is not just one shred of proof of that and many factual arguments of his father and Nizami’s personal self-see as Turk.
Also allow me to assure Mr. Baguirov that Tabari has pointed out number of persian poets from Azarbaijan in 8th century A.D. So Arabic and Persian developed there really early. Also You will find there's superior quantity of firetemples which exhibits the Iranian characteristic of your area. And also an excellent level of Pahlavi inscriptions. Also if someone say an African writes the most beneficial pieces of Irish folklore, in Gaelic, then I consider this sort of an individual as culturally Gaelic instead of African. Just what exactly is basically essential is lifestyle In regards to poetry. A poet Based on 1 web page: life in the language. If X was Armenian, but wrote the ideal Turkish poetry, then culturally he can be Turkish.
eight) We do not wish to put a hundred traces of bickering about Nizami’s ethnicity while in the Wikipedia report. People which will examine his poems will practically determine it out what culture he belonged to. Even Stalin claimed that Nizami experienced Turkish functions, whilst no scholar can take this type of make a difference significantly, because Turkish poetry first confirmed up from the area during Ilkhanid period. Now we have agreed with other consumers not for making this post about Nizamis ethnicity but about Nizami Ganjavi. I'm able to feature hordes of arguments. Like why would Nizami frequently praise Ferdowsi plus the Persian nationalistic dynasty with the Sassanids. Or why did he belittle Turks via Shirvanshah and praised the ShirvanShah. Or why he isn't going to even have one particular verse in Turkish. And why he derides the Khaghan of Turks so badly. And why he has published that he has appeared through Persian, Arabic, Bukhari, Tabari resources, but not Turkish.
نخستين نويسنده‌ي پان‌تركيست مي‌نويسد: «يكي ازاسناد مهمي كه ازØضور اقوام ترك زبان درآذربايجان پيش از اسلام Øكايت دارد "اخبار عبدين شريه" [در متن چنين است] است. عبيد در دوره جاهليت در يمن به دنيا آمده Ùˆ يكي ازمعمرين Ùˆ جهانديدگان دوره خلاÙت معاويه بوده است. معاويه اورا به دمشق دعوت كرد Ùˆ از اخبار عرب Ùˆ ملوك آن قوم جويا شد Ùˆ وي به پرسش‌هاي معاويه پاسخ داد. به دستور معاويه اخبار او تدوين گرديد […] درجريان Ú¯Ùتگوي عبيد با معاويه دوبار ازآذربايجان سخن به ميان آمده است.
Nizami lived in Seljuk empire, in the Azerbaijani Atabek condition – a Turkic-dominated and Turkic-dominated, specifically in his city, point out, although Iran didn't exist and was split into numerous states, including Turkic-ruled – and almost all of it beneath the domain of Seljuks and various Turkic individuals. Therefore, Nizami whilst remaining a Persian-language poet and contributing to Persian poetry and being considered one of the greatest these types of consultant, was neither Persian nor Iranian.
This all over again is really a forgery and lie. Show it by bringing the first Persian as It's not necessarily in The 2 prints accessible to me.
twelve) The shirvanshah’s were being only nominally beneath look at here the Seljuq’s as well as their regents, the Azerbaijani Atabeks, and didn't fork out them or mention in the prayers or coins.
So, so far as accuracy and veracity is anxious of Afak/Appaq or horizon, I am right, considering the fact that I foundation my opinion on Every single and every scholar I’ve browse, whether Western or Soviet, although Mr. Doostzadeh’s Model is simply a theory by a few Students.
Considering the fact that Mr. Doostzadeh repeatedly shows absence of information and knowledge of Nizami’s poetry – thus proving Having said that Nafisi was right along with his quote to academician Marr – and statements, most likely only as a consequence of his anti-Azerbaijani, anti-Turkic racism – that “everybody knows Shirin was Christian [and thus needed to be Armenian]â€, listed here’s an interesting passage in the poem (the verse’s higher than, as well as subsequent a person’s, already proved that Shirin and her aunt Mihin-Banu merely could not are already Armenian (Irrespective of processing Armenia as being a vassal territory) and were being Arranian (Azerbaijani) and Turkic, consequently now I will even demonstrate that Shirin wasn't Christian).
His verse did not exist. But the above persians verses can be taken as metaphor and there is no cause for me to consider aspect on this situation, given that we won't ever know for a hundred%. All We all know is usually that regardless of whether she was a Turkic slave given by the ruler of Darband, this does not make Nizami’s father a Turk! And furthermore we know that there is no manuscript with Apaq and Nizami makes use of the term Afaq about 46 as this means horizon and It will be unusual for just a poet to all of a sudden indicate a distinct matter by making use of this word!
Mr. Doostzadeh appears to be to possess a good deal of your time on his arms to drum-up his lengthy accusations and promises. By just i thought about this reversing the Thoughts and assertions place forward by this writer (respectable accusations of bias and racism In terms of Azerbaijani history and historic figures about the Portion of these types of chauvinists as Mr. Doostzadeh), he could Imagine he did smth worthy of becoming pleased with. Mr. Doostzadeh is way out of his league when he will make nonetheless a lot more irrelevant, baseless and groundless assertions about “Azarbaijani Chavaunism†(sic!